LP #6 The Helping Process; The TFA Model
Chapter four
“The Helping Process” in our text spells out vital characteristics of the
helper, some being positive regard, congruence, acceptance, empathy, warmth,
open-mindedness, self-awareness, respect, rapport, trust, genuineness and self-understanding.
I confidently own many of these traits at varying depths. Some indifferent
moments are sometimes dictated by the environment and connectedness to or
with the client. The traits are natural manners that are conducive to a therapeutic
relationship, but they don’t necessarily equate to a comprehensive approach in
helping clients to grow towards personal goals and developing powers in coping
with life. Finding solutions and assisting clients to invest themselves in a
partnership with a counselor, such as me, will necessitate the use of tools,
structures, models and systems within specific approaches. One of the effective
approaches that will help to develop my style and effectiveness, that I know I
will incorporate into my usage as a competent counselor, will be the TFA (Thoughts,
Feelings and Actions) model.
A large
portion of our chapter was devoted to explaining the AGATE Model, which I broke
down in my Mind Map. I will undoubtedly use this model, but I was fascinated by
a component of that model which happened to be using the TFA model. This model
is a component of the AGATE model. The TFA approach exists within the AGATE
model at the Action stage. In the Action stage the TFA model is implemented
to “understand how Thoughts, Feelings and Actions relate to behavior, which is crucial
in achieving change” (Corliss & Corliss, 2006, p. 117). Thoughts,
Feelings and Actions are all integrated and interconnected with
each other. For me, this was such an
easy and simplistic acronym to apply, yet it’s concept is very powerful and
dynamic in presenting effective procedures designed to help clients change
their behavior. Feelings are born from Thoughts. Thoughts are the birth source
that originates the source of why a client Feels the way that they do. Feeling
or experiencing those emotions are often the powerful dictator of how we behave,
or our Actions. My personal experience and colorful association to this
model is vividly engrained with multiple interactions with a client I often had
to help or assist, with refocusing her attentions on the outcome-behaviors.
Attention and interventions should of also been addressing the components of Thoughts
and Feelings
Her Actions or behaviors are what I was
continually trying to wrongly address. She was anxiety stricken and would occasionally
slip into a state of panic behavior. Her father’s health was deteriorating
quickly due to his years of continued alcohol abuse. She was emotionally and
mentally neglected during her childhood years, yet she was always there to care
and provide for him, the best she could; due to her love for her father. Yet while
in treatment herself, she was experiencing emotional growth and vulnerabilities
she had not experienced since being a child.
To make a
long story short. Her thoughts, which stemmed from patterned dysfunction and
neglect were never matured or developed healthy because there was a lack of
nurturing, care, safety and love within the family environment. Her maladjusted
thoughts were fueling her feelings. Her feelings would consume her with a
belief of uselessness, unworthiness and incapable of being loved or cared for by
anyone. These overwhelming feelings she was experiencing, were dictating her
actions. Those actions took the form of immature, irresponsible and unaccountable
behavior. She would often have emotional outbursts that were very disruptive and
alarming to other residents and staff. I was often trying to talk her off a
ledge, calming her down by addressing her Actions or behavior. In hindsight, If
I would of applied, or been more deeply aware of this model’s (TFA) application
I would of addressed her Thoughts; the origination source that became
her Feelings. Her Actions (behaviors), were a byproduct of her Feelings,
which originated with her Thoughts.
Because the
client’s primary frame of reference showed regret and shame for her behavior, a
cognitive-based approach, like Cognitive Behavior Therapy could have been a
behavior approach that would have probably been effective and useful. Because
she was unable to regulate her Thoughts, she was then very susceptible
to strong Feelings. After each emotional outburst or overreaction with
behavior, she would experience deep regret and shame for her actions. The TFA
model can be incorporated with various procedures and interventions by starting
with techniques that relate directly to a client’s primary frame of reference (Corliss
& Corliss, 2006, p. 117).
References
Corliss, L. A.,
& Corliss, R. A. (2006). Human Service Agencies- An
Orientation to Fieldwork (2nd ed.). Cengage Learning.
Comments
Post a Comment